@tarun_svbk I understood your point in the previous comment and I agree but the statement given is if a vertex has a child labelled $\lambda$, then it has to be on the right which is wrong by virtue of the counter examples I gave above but what you were saying is not what the statement says, the statement talks about the vertex which has leaf labelled $\lambda$ not about the leaf, $\lambda$. I think the argument should be what I said for the 3rd statement