in Calculus edited by
769 views
0 votes
0 votes

Let $(x_n)$ be a sequence of a real number such that the subsequence $(x_{2n})$ and $(x_{3n})$ converge to limit $K$ and $L$ respectively. Then

  1. $(x_n)$ always converge
  2. If $K=L$ then $(x_n)$ converge
  3. $(x_n)$ may not converge but $K=L$
  4. it is possible to have $K \neq L$
in Calculus edited by
by
769 views

3 Comments

edited by
option C

If k=l the sequence may not converge.
0
0
When limit increasing if the number going towards 0, then it will converge

no options matching
0
0
Srestha I am not getting what are u saying?
0
0

1 Answer

1 vote
1 vote

Consider the theorem 

If a sequence Xn is convergent to $ l $ then all its subsequences Xm is convergent to $ l $ .

Now consider the sequence 

                                    Xn = -1   when n is a prime number.

                           and   Xn =  1   otherwise.

Then we get that the subsequence X2n is  1,1,1,........ thus the sequence X2n is convergent to 1. 

Hence k=1.

Again we also get that X3n is 1,1,1,........... thus the sequence X3n is convergent to 1.

Hence $ l $ = 1.

So, k = $ l $.

Now, consider the subsequence Xm where m is a prime. Then Xm is -1,-1,-1,......... thus the sequence Xm is convergent to -1.

So, we get that all the subsequences of Xn is not convergent to a particular number. So, Xn is divergent. But here we have k = $ l $.

So, option C is correct Xn may not converge but k = $ l $.

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true