A grammar is said to have cycles if it is the case that $A \overset{+}{\Rightarrow} A$
A context-free grammar is cyclic if there exists a non-terminal A and a derivation in one or more steps A⟹+ A. It is left-recursive if there exists a non-terminal A, a mixed sequence of terminals and non-terminals γ, and a derivation in one or more steps A⇒+ Aγ. Hence cyclic implies left-recursive, but the converse does not hold.
A context-free grammar is cyclic if there exists a non-terminal A and a derivation in one or more steps A⟹+ A. It is left-recursive if there exists a non-terminal A, a mixed sequence of terminals and non-terminals γ, and a derivation in one or more steps A⇒+ Aγ.
Hence cyclic implies left-recursive, but the converse does not hold.
https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/18609/difference-between-a-cyclic-and-a-left-recursive-context-free-grammar
@Ayush Upadhyaya what is the meaning of extended transition?? Does that mean if any non terminal to the RHS of A is replaced by its value then it will be left recursive?
I mean
A => B b
B => Ac
which is indirectly A=> Acb
$a^∗−(b+c)$
We have the infix (inorder) expression.
This will be the equivalent postfix: $a^∗(bc+)-$
You have infix, you have postfix, now make the tree.
Cycle => Loop => Usage of Left Recursive Grammar. So, can't be LL(1)
A. Convert $a^∗−(b+c)$
How to check if the syntax tree is correct? Find inorder traversal of the tree it should give above expression. (infix expression)
Image source: Answer below.
B.
left recusion grammar cannot be LL(1).
Ref: https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/18609/difference-between-a-cyclic-and-a-left-recursive-context-free-grammar
64.3k questions
77.9k answers
244k comments
80.0k users