Compiler Design: Conflict

sourabh asked in Compiler Design Jan 1, 2016 retagged Jun 18, 2022 by Lakshman Bhaiya

808 views

2 votes

If lalr(1) has no conflict then clr(1) never contain any conflict

It is true or false

If it is false explain

compiler-design
parsing
lr-parser
true-false

sourabh asked in Compiler Design Jan 1, 2016 retagged Jun 18, 2022 by Lakshman Bhaiya

by sourabh

808 views

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

3 votes

Best answer

It is true.

Because once we construct CLR table and it has no conflict then we go for merging the

states(LALR) and still there are chances for Reduce-Reduce Conflict in LALR table.

- But question says LALR has no conflict, then surely CLR has no conflict.

Himanshu1 answered Jan 1, 2016 selected Jan 16, 2016 by Pooja Palod

by Himanshu1

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

← Previous Next →

← Previous in category Next in category →

Related questions

2 votes

1 answer

arch asked in Compiler Design Nov 19, 2017

304 views

parser
every LL(k) grammer is also SLR(k) grammer. (true / false)

arch asked in Compiler Design Nov 19, 2017

by arch

304 views

compiler-design
parsing
ll-parser
lr-parser
true-false

2 votes

2 answers

kallu singh asked in Compiler Design Sep 5, 2017

656 views

Please solve my doubt
Q if any Grammar is LL(1) definitely LALR(1) ? It is true or false Please ans explain in detail.

kallu singh asked in Compiler Design Sep 5, 2017

by kallu singh

656 views

compiler-design
parsing
ll-parser
lr-parser
true-false

1 vote

2 answers

gate_forum asked in Compiler Design Dec 31, 2016

608 views

parsing
State True/False : "LR(0)⊂SLR(1)⊂LALR(1)⊂LR(1)".

gate_forum asked in Compiler Design Dec 31, 2016

by gate_forum

608 views

compiler-design
parsing
lr-parser
true-false

0 votes

2 answers

sripo asked in Compiler Design Nov 1, 2018

2,305 views

Is the given grammar CLR(1) or not please explain me if there is a shift reduce conflict
S→(X S→E] S→E) X→E) X→E] E→ϵ Is this grammar CLR(1)? The answer says it is but I find a shift reduce conflict for E-> epsilon with lookup symbols ),]

sripo asked in Compiler Design Nov 1, 2018

by sripo

2.3k views

compiler-design
parsing
lr-parser
descriptive

tags	tag:apple
author	user:martin
title	title:apple
content	content:apple
exclude	-tag:apple
force match	+apple
views	views:100
score	score:10
answers	answers:2
is accepted	isaccepted:true
is closed	isclosed:true

Conflict

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions

Subscribe to GATE CSE 2024 Test Series

Subscribe to GO Classes for GATE CSE 2024

Subjects

Conflict

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions

Subscribe to GATE CSE 2024 Test Series

Subscribe to GO Classes for GATE CSE 2024

Recent Posts

Subjects

Recent Blog Comments