in Verbal Aptitude retagged by
3,578 views
8 votes
8 votes

The dawn of the $21$st century witnessed the melting glaciers oscillating between giving too much and too little to billions of people who depend on them for fresh water. The UN climate report estimates that without deep cuts to man-made emissions, at least $30\%$ of the northern hemisphere’s surface permafrost could melt by the end of the century. Given this situation of imminent global exodus of billions of people displaced by rising seas, nation-states need to rethink their carbon footprint for political concerns, if not for environmental ones.

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the given passage?

  1. Nation-states do not have environmental concerns.
  2. Nation-states are responsible for providing fresh water to billions of people.
  3. Billions of people are responsible for man-made emissions.
  4. Billions of people are affected by melting glaciers.
in Verbal Aptitude retagged by
by
3.6k views

3 Answers

3 votes
3 votes
Best answer
  1. Nation-states do not have environmental concerns.
    The only statement in the given passage referring to nation-states is “nation-states need to rethink their carbon footprint”. But this does not imply that nation-states do not have environmental concerns.
  2. Nation-states are responsible for providing fresh water to billions of people.
    Like the previous statement this is also not said anywhere in the given passage
  3. Billions of people are responsible for man-made emissions.
    ”nation-states need to rethink their carbon footprint” – means nation-states are responsible for man-made emissions but it does not mean “billions of people” – could be a few hundreds or thousands.
  4. Billions of people are affected by melting glaciers.
    ”situation of imminent global exodus of billions of people displaced by rising seas” clearly implies this.

Correct option: D.

selected by
by

1 comment

Sir , what about this

nation-states need to rethink their carbon footprint for political concerns, if not for environmental ones.

won’t it support A also?

3
3
7 votes
7 votes

The first lines in the passage tells about how melting glacier affects the water supply for various people.Also, it is being predicted that billions of people will be displaced by rising sea levels.Clealry, billions of people are affected by melting glaciers and the Answer here is (D)

4 Comments

Sir due to the statement -nation state need to rethink their carbon carbon footprint for political concern if not for environmental concern

Option B is also true.
0
0
no, its 2 marks. 100% sure. my very 1st question.
0
0
as i remember one question of critica reasoning is of 2 mark and one is of 1 mark so. it means gdp question was of 1 mark
0
0
2 votes
2 votes

D. 

Options A, B completely eliminated because there's no clue given that they provide fresh water and concern about environment or not

In option C billions of people are responsible for man made emissions not given in passage 

Option D clearly explaining second last line of passage

Answer:

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true