in Set Theory & Algebra edited by
11,339 views
32 votes
32 votes

A partial order $P$ is defined on the set of natural numbers as follows. Here $\frac{x}{y}$ denotes integer division.

  1. $(0, 0) \in P.$
  2. $(a, b) \in P$ if and only if $(a \% 10) \leq (b \% 10$) and $(\frac{a}{10},\frac{b}{10})\in  P.$

Consider the following ordered pairs:

  1. $(101, 22)$
  2. $(22, 101)$
  3. $(145, 265)$
  4. $(0, 153)$

Which of these ordered pairs of natural numbers are contained in $P$?

  1. (i) and (iii)
  2. (ii) and (iv)
  3. (i) and (iv)
  4. (iii) and (iv)
in Set Theory & Algebra edited by
11.3k views

4 Comments

How we will know we have to do it recursively as it's nowhere mentioned In question or should we use smes extra brain thinking that 101/10 and 22/10 gives (10,2) and can (10,2) be part of relation? Well no coz 10%10 and 2%10 gives (1,2) which fails first condition.
5
5
But P is defined on the set of natural numbers
0
0

Is the Question itself trying to explain Partial Order (P) by giving the condition:

  1. (0,0)∈P.(0,0)∈P.
  2. (a,b)∈P(a,b)∈P if and only if (a%10)≤(b%10(a%10)≤(b%10) and (a10,b10)∈P.

If both satisfy then it’s Partial Order else not?

0
0

7 Answers

42 votes
42 votes
Best answer

Ans. D
For ordered pair $(a, b),$ to be in $P,$ each digit in a starting from unit place must not be larger than the corresponding digit in $b.$

This condition is satisfied by options

  • (iii) $(145, 265) \to 5 ≤ 5, 4 < 6$ and $1 < 2$
  • (iv) $(0, 153) \to 0 < 3$ and no need to examine further
selected by

15 Comments

for third (1645,245), how is 145%10 <265 %10 they are same as both are 5
0
0
I think < must be ≤ in question.
6
6
yes ur correcta Arjun!
0
0

yes, it is ≤ in the actual question.

4
4
Why not 101,22
2
2

Original question was with simply < condition. (Please correct the questions)

(a, b) ∊ P if and only if a % 10 < b % 10 and (a/10, b/10) ∊ P

(i) (101,22) is in P :

        Reason:   101%10 < 22 %10 implies 1 < 2 is true

                          and (101/10, 22/10) = (10,2) should be in P, So we should verify (10,2) pair : (10%10 < 2%10)  implies 0 < 2 is true and (10/10, 2/10) = (1,2) is in P. So pair (101, 22) is in P

(ii) (22, 101) is not in P:

        22%10 < 101%10 implies 2 < 1 is false. Therefore (ii) is not in P.

(iii) (145, 265) is not in P:  

          145 %10 < 265 %10 implies 5 < 5 is false. Therefore (iii) is not in P.

(iv) (0, 153) is in P :

        Reason:   0%10 < 153 %10 implies 0 < 3 is true

                          and (0/10, 153/10) = (0, 15) should be in P, So we should verify (0,15) pair: (0%10 < 15%10)  implies 0 < 5 is true and (0/10, 15/10) = (0,1) is in P. 

       So pair (0, 153) is in P

Answer is (i) and (iv) : Option (C) is correct.

7
7

but (10/10, 2/10) = (1,0) and not (1, 2) and hence not in P

17
17

≤ can be seen if we look very carefully in the question here. Unfortunately I couldn't find a better source. 

http://www.examrace.com/GATE/GATE-Previous-Years-Papers/Information-Technology/GATE-Information-Technology-2007.html#pdfsection_ef89c298-page_3-locus_73

1
1
very nice.. Yes it should be less than or equal.. Thank you
2
2
why option (i) 101,22 is not correct ?
1
1
Why options i is not correct?
0
0
is there any significance to specifying "partial order"? I feel, even if it was not partial order, but just a simple relation, then even the solution would have been same, right?
0
0
how to do ypu understand % is modulus not divide operator?
0
0
@Vikrant How do we know that computing a%10 and b%10 is iterative (doing it till number becomes 0) since it is not explicitly mentioned in the question?
3
3

@shetu_raj for (101,22) to belong to P, 101/10(=10) & 22/10(=2) should belong to P, for (10,2) to belong to P we repeat the similar process

0
0
13 votes
13 votes

it is just like recursion for more understandbility we hve following ideas as.

We will have to check each and every condition recursive untill condition become completed.

Now check for (145,265)      a%10<=b%10 now remaining(14,26) again check a%10<=b%10 yes again check .

Similraly u can apply for option four .

11 votes
11 votes

(i)      (101, 22)

                 |

    -----------------

      |                |

   (1,2)         (10,2)

                      |

            --------------

              |              |

           (0,2)         (1,0)  ---> fails here bcz (a !<= b)

likewise you can check other options.

(iii) & (iv) are correct, hence option D    

by
1 vote
1 vote

Since P is given to be a partial order relation, options (i) & (ii) are ruled out as they violate  antisymmetry which says that if (a,b)∊R & (b,a)∊R => a=b but 22 ≠101.

Now 145%10≤265%10 and the evaluating the second condition gives (0,0) which is given to be in P. In similar vein (iv) can also be checked to be in P. 

Hence option iii & iv is correct.

1 comment

@Aman_verma
145 ≠ 265

0≠153

Does it also violate asymmetric conditions ??

 

1
1
Answer:

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true