in Mathematical Logic edited by
6,272 views
28 votes
28 votes

Let $a(x, y), b(x, y,)$ and $c(x, y)$ be three statements with variables $x$ and $y$ chosen from some universe. Consider the following statement:

$\qquad(\exists x)(\forall y)[(a(x, y) \wedge b(x, y)) \wedge \neg c(x, y)]$

Which one of the following is its equivalent?

  1. $(\forall x)(\exists y)[(a(x, y) \vee b(x, y)) \to c(x, y)]$
  2. $(\exists x)(\forall y)[(a(x, y) \vee b(x, y)) \wedge\neg c(x, y)]$
  3. $\neg (\forall x)(\exists y)[(a(x, y) \wedge b(x, y)) \to c(x, y)]$
  4. $\neg (\forall x)(\exists y)[(a(x, y) \vee b(x, y)) \to c(x, y)]$
in Mathematical Logic edited by
6.3k views

2 Answers

62 votes
62 votes
Best answer

$(\exists x)(\forall y)[(a(x, y) \wedge b(x, y)) \wedge ¬c(x, y)]$

$\quad \equiv ¬(\forall x)¬(\forall y)[(a(x, y) \wedge b(x, y)) \wedge ¬c(x, y)]$
$\quad (\because (\exists x) F(x) = \neg \forall x \neg F(x))$

$\quad \equiv ¬(\forall x)(\exists y)¬[(a(x, y) \wedge b(x, y)) \wedge ¬c(x, y)]$
$\quad (\because (\forall x) F(x) = \neg \exists x \neg F(x)), \neg \neg F(x) = F(x))$

$\quad \equiv ¬(\forall x)(\exists y)[¬(a(x, y) \wedge b(x, y)) \vee c(x, y)]$

$\quad \equiv ¬(\forall x)(\exists y)[(a(x, y) \wedge b(x, y)) → c(x, y)]$

(C) choice.

edited by
by

4 Comments

srestha

what is now not in syllabus??

0
0
edited by

@akash

I thought it is logic programming

like this https://gateoverflow.in/958/gate2003-71

sorry misunderstood

1
1

@Arjun sir, do we have to check the logical equivalence for each option like this? because, then it will consume quite a good amount of time. Any other quick way to figure it out?

0
0
0 votes
0 votes

.

Answer:

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true