Are you really comparing GATE and PSU questions?
I am not comparing anything, Why would I compare ? I have no relation with any of the two. I was answering your question and making your statements correct so that wrong/incomplete info should not be spread.
I have seen on many places, some influential people write something and people start believing them that they are correct without doing any research about it and start making a negative image of something/someone.
This is not a personal attack on you or any educational institute or anyone. First you said "no new questions come in psu", so I corrected your statement by giving an example. Next, you said "...”new questions” like GATE/ISI etc.", so, I had given a counter-example. Those things we don't know, we should simply say, we don't know. We don't know whether only single digit(negligible) number of copied questions come in gate or more than that.
I have shown one example. Other examples can also be possible. We don't know.
As I said there are many books and resources are available, it is difficult to get the answer of this question, you are guessing it which can or can not be true.
Those person who set the paper can tell the exact number.
We can only say, most of the times, gate questions do not repeat.
Like you told PSUs have no need to ask newly framed questions
I have never said this, probably you should have to read that comment again :)
Both have goods and bads and I think, they should have to work on it. I know what you want to convey the message about PSUs and I agree on some part of it. My intention was to make things correct.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------