in Set Theory & Algebra edited by
9,136 views
25 votes
25 votes

The following is the Hasse diagram of the poset $\left[\{a,b,c,d,e\},≺\right]$

The poset is :

  1. not a lattice
  2. a lattice but not a distributive lattice
  3. a distributive lattice but not a Boolean algebra
  4. a Boolean algebra
in Set Theory & Algebra edited by
by
9.1k views

4 Comments

right Jashan Arora
0
0

A lattice is not distributive if it has KITE or PENTAGONAL structure as sub-lattice or lattice itself is Kite/Pentagonal.

 

 

 

1
1
edited by

Is it a Lattice? 

 Yes. LUB and GLB exist for every pair of elements.

Is it a Bounded lattice?

 Yes. Every finite lattice is bounded.

Is it a Complemented lattice?

→ Yes. for every element complement is there.

Is it a Distributive lattice?

→ No. Because for some elements more than one complement exists.

Is it a Boolean Algebra lattice?

→ No. Because it is not distributive.


Complement of a  = e.

Complement of e  = a.

Complement of b  = c, d.

Complement of c  = b, d.

Complement of d  = c, b.

7
7

4 Answers

30 votes
30 votes
Best answer

Option B.

A lattice has a least upper bound (lub) and a greatest upper bound (glb), but to be distributive every element of the lattice should have at most one complement.Here, elements $b,c,d$ are complements of each other and hence the given lattice is not distributive.

Ref: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2814774/example-of-a-lattice-which-has-at-most-1-complement-for-its-every-element-but-it

edited by
by

10 Comments

0
0
Yes it is a lattice should have unambiguous unique suprenum and infinum for all horizontal elements in the hasse diagram.
7
7
How to calculate complement can any1 plz explain.

Thank you in advance
0
0
edited by
shubhamdarokar try checking whether LHS and RHS are same in  $b \wedge (c \vee d)=(b\wedge c)\vee(b\wedge d)$. If yes, it is a distributive lattice, else not.
0
0
edited by

$\bullet$ It's a lattice as it's every pair of elements has LUB and GLB.

$\bullet$ It is not a distributive lattice as-
$\Rightarrow \ b ∧ (c ∨ d) = b ∧ a = b$
$(b ∧ c) ∨ (b ∧ d) = e ∨ e = e$
$b \neq e $

$\Rightarrow$ All 3 elements- b,c and d have 2 complements.

$\Rightarrow$ It's a famous diamond structure $(M_3)$ lattice which is non-distributive. Moreover, any lattice is distributive if and only if it does not contain $M_3 \ or \ N_5$ as sublattice.

$\bullet$ A lattice is a Boolean algebra if and only if it is distributive and complemented.
It is not distributive hence not boolean algebra. 

26
26

Regarding lattice I've two doubts,

  1. taking (b,c) it has upperbound 'a' & lowerbound 'e' then what is the LUB & GLB, Is 'a' & 'e' itself LUB & GLB?????
  2. Suppose if we take (e,d) then what will be the LUB & GLB????

please correct me where I'm lacking???

0
0

@MRINMOY_HALDER 1.LUB is Least(Minimum) element in Upper Bound and GLB is Greatest(Minimum) element in Lower Bound.

2. For (e,d) LUB is d and GLB is e.

0
0
It is a well known non-distributive lattice-The "Kite" lattice.
9
9

I think this statement is wrong.

A lattice has lub and glb but to be distributive it should also have a unique complement.

It is also possible for some elements of a lattice to not a complement but still  it is  distributive lattice.

Ex. All tosets with number of elements > 2

 

A distributive lattice ==> at most one complement for each element

More than one complement for atleast one element ==> not distributive lattice.

In the question b has c, d as complements so not distributive.

 

2
2
Yes, that sentence was not right. Corrected now.
0
0
9 votes
9 votes
Option B is appropriate for it.

It is lattice bcz both LUB and GLB exist for each pair of the vertex in the above Hasse diagram.

But It is not Distributed bcz there exist more than a complement of element. So it ever be Boolean algebra.
edited by

2 Comments

@Paras Nath given Hasse diagram is totally different from poset  i think given reation is not '<' (less than ) it is other relation defined according to hasse diagram 

0
0
yes, it may be any relation. because nothing is mentioned about it. But, this can be answered by looking at hasse diagram only.
5
5
1 vote
1 vote

A lattice is a distributive lattice if each element has at most one complement.

Complements of b are c and d.

So, not distributive.

 

It sure is a lattice, though. So, Option B


 

Why is it not a Boolean algebra?

  • If every element of the lattice has at least one complement => Complemented lattice.
     
  • If every element of the lattice has strictly either 0 or 1 complement => Distributive lattice.
     
  • A complemented distributed lattice is a necessary condition for being Boolean algebra. (So Option D is False)

1 comment

A Distributive Complemented lattice is Boolean Algebra. Its definition of Boolean Algebra, so both necessary and sufficient condition(bi-implication).

Boolean Algebra ↔ (Distributive & Complemented & Lattice)

Property of bi-implication says for true,  F ↔ F or T ↔ T .

Using Contrapositive , Not Distributive → Not Boolean Algebra
0
0
0 votes
0 votes

.

Answer:

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true