in Mathematical Logic
3,534 views
0 votes
0 votes

Which of the following shall be a compound proposition involving the propositions p, q and r, that is true when exactly two of the p, q and r are true and is false otherwise?

  1. $(p \vee q \wedge \rceil r) \vee (p \wedge q \wedge r) \wedge (\rceil p \wedge q \vee r)$
  2. $(p \wedge q \vee r) \wedge (p \wedge q \wedge r) \vee (\rceil q \wedge \rceil q \wedge \rceil r)$
  3. $(p \wedge q \wedge \rceil r) \vee (p \wedge \rceil q \wedge r) \vee (\rceil p \wedge q \wedge r)$
  4. $(p \vee r \wedge q) \vee (p \wedge q \wedge r) \vee (\rceil p \wedge q \wedge r)$
in Mathematical Logic
3.5k views

1 comment

I am unable to find difference with the options, all seems same
0
0

2 Answers

1 vote
1 vote

(P⋂Q⋂R')    -> P and Q are true and R is False [exactly two are true]

U

(P⋂Q'⋂R)     -> P and R are true and Q is False [exactly two are true]

U

(P'⋂Q⋂R)     -> Q and R are true and P is False [exactly two are true]

edited by

2 Comments

y not and in (PUQUR')    -> P and Q are true and R is False [exactly two are true]

U
 here y not and?? y or??
(PUQ'UR)     -> P and R are true and Q is False [exactly two are true]

U

(P'UQUR

0
0
Exactly you are right. Edited the solution
0
0
0 votes
0 votes

Catching the condition given in the question that "exactly two of the p, q and r are true and is false otherwise." 

by solving option (b) like   (1 1 1) ^ (1 1 1) v (0 0 0) = (1 1 1) also gives true but,

Option (c)  is correct because it matches the condition given in the question having exactly two of p,q and r are true.

Hence, option (c)  is correct.

Answer:

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true