in Calculus edited by
1,962 views
7 votes
7 votes

The function $f (x) = 2.5 \log_e  \left( 2 + \exp \left( x^2  - 4x + 5 \right)\right)$ attains a minimum at $x = $?

  1. $0$
  2. $1$
  3. $2$
  4. $3$
  5. $4$
in Calculus edited by
2.0k views

3 Answers

27 votes
27 votes
Best answer
$f(x)$ will be minimum at $x = 2,$
Here is another approach.
Since log and exponent are monotonically increasing functions, the problem of minimizing $f(x)$ can be reduced to just minimizing the quadratic expression $x^{2} - 4x + 5,$
This quadratic expression can be written as $(x^{2} - 4x + 4) + 1$ which is equal to $(x - 2)^{2} + 1.$
Now since $(x - 2)^{2}$ can not be less than $0$, so $(x - 2)^{2} + 1$ can not be less than $1.$
Also $(x - 2)^{2} + 1$ will be at its minimum value $(= 1)$, when $x = 2.$

So, value of $f(x)$ will be minimum at $x = 2.$
edited by

1 comment

Nice one :)
1
1
4 votes
4 votes
Just differentiate whole function and put value =0, x comes out to be 2.
1nd derivative +ve here, so minima
edited by

5 Comments

"1nd derivative +ve here, so minima"  how?

I know when 2nd derivative is +ve then that point is minima.
0
0
Did you get this resolved?
0
0
Can we decide if the roots are maxima or minima on the basis of the first derivative?
0
0
I guess by “1nd” he meant “2nd”.
0
0
after finding critical pt.s you can try first derivative test easily.

here f’’(x) is difficult to calc. then we can see f’(x) is +ve in x<2 and -ve after 2.

so function is decreasing till 2 then increasing. so x = 2 is pt. of minima.
0
0
1 vote
1 vote

In this question it is not necessary to either use differentiation or anything much different.

Just see that how this expression simplifies =>

After cancelling out log & Exponent we get something like =>

2.5ln2 + 2.5 ( x2-4x+5 )

Now 2.5ln2 will be there same in all x values.

Just put in all values one by one, it is not hard to see that , At x = 2 we get minimum value !

Answer c

2 Comments

I don't understood how you cancelled log.

After cancelling out log & Exponent we get something like =>

2.5ln2 + 2.5 ( x2-4x+5 )

1
1
^
This solution is wrong, He assumed $log(a+b) = log(a)+log(b)$ which is clerly wrong.
8
8
Answer:

Related questions

Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true