Soln. (My Solution)
.Lets Break it down shall we ?
Lets take an instance:-
Dno Dname Phone Office
1 A X,Y Z,P
We know Dno --> Phone,Office,Dname
Currently above one is not in 1nf so by converting it we get:-
Dno Dname Phone Office
1 A X Z
1 A X P
1 A Y Z
1 A Y P
Now its in 1nf. But Now the Primary key is (Dno,Phone,Office) ---> Dname
but we know that Dno --> Dname
So its a Partial Dependency Hence not in 2nf
Lets Break it Down Further :----
A (Dno , Dname) Dno as Primary Key
B (Dno,Phone,Office) and Primary key is (Dno,Phone,Office) collectively. So only two tables is required.
So is it a right statement :- "If a relation has m number of multi-valued attribute then no need for m extra table only 1 table extra required like i just showed above" Ain't that right?
Is my solution Worth it ?