Gate cse 19

Question

The beggar question had 2 probable options,

The lack of schemes or the other option

Which one was the correct Choice

Comments

I found lack of schemes more correct.

---

In my opinion the other one was correct, since that option could be derived directly n to get lack of schemes, this wasn't clearly specified

Answer 1

A recent high court judgment has sought to dispel idea of begging as a disease- which leads to its stigmatization and criminalization and regard it as symptom. The underlying disease is the failure of state to protect citizen who fall through social security net. Which of the following can be inferred above?

(A) Begging has to be banned because it adversely affects welfare of the state

(B) Begging is an offence the has to dealt firmly

(C) Beggar are created due to lack of welfare scheme of state

(D) Beggar are criminals

 

The first line of the paragraph states that A recent high court judgment has sought to dispel idea of begging ..............

Here dispel itself means banning or eliminating so the most apt. answer would be the option

Begging has to be banned because it adversely affects welfare of the state.

Besides nothing has been mentioned about the scheme of welfare from the statement.

Comments

Leading to its stigmatization and criminalisation implies as an offence...so option b should b correct.

Condition of state can't be commented upon

---

Dispel means banning, then affecting relates to failure of state and then protection of people as part of social security comes under state of welfare. Well, 3 points of implications.