Register

Is there three SR conflict in the CLR(1) grammar

• retagged by
1,390 views

1 Answer

Best answer
2 votes
2 votes
We do not consider I1 state because that production has been added by us to show accept state, it is not a part of given production
• selected by
User Avatar
Voting & Accepting an answer helps improve the community
← PreviousNext →
← Previous in categoryNext in category →

Related questions

0 votes
0 votes
2 answers
1
sripo asked Nov 1, 2018
2,324 views
Is the given grammar CLR(1) or not please explain me if there is a shift reduce conflict
S→(X S→E] S→E) X→E) X→E] E→ϵ Is this grammar CLR(1)? The answer says it is but I find a shift reduce conflict for E-> epsilon with lookup symbols ),]
S→(XS→E]S→E)X→E)X→E]E→ϵIs this grammar CLR(1)? The answer says it is but I find a shift reduce conflict for E- epsilon with lookup symbols ),]
User Avatar
3 votes
3 votes
3 answers
2
thor asked Nov 15, 2016
2,292 views
Is there SR conflict in SLR(1) ?
User Avatar
0 votes
0 votes
1 answer
3
sripo asked Nov 1, 2018
541 views
Is there shift reduce conflict in this production?
For given production for a LR(1) grammar B->b.C ,$|c here C is non terminal C->c. ,$|c and here c is terminal. $|c are lookup symbols Will there be a shift reduce conflict if a non terminal is visited.Please explain how shift reduce conflict works
For given production for a LR(1) grammarB->b.C ,$|c here C is non terminalC->c. ,$|c and here c is terminal. $|c are lookup symbolsWill there be a shift reduce conflict...
User Avatar
2 votes
2 votes
1 answer
4
sripo asked Nov 10, 2018
3,191 views
If grammar is not LL(1) then it can never be CLR(1) or LALR(1)?
Can you give an example which is not LL(1) but is CLR(1)
Can you give an example which is not LL(1) but is CLR(1)
User Avatar
Link Copied!