in Set Theory & Algebra
571 views
1 vote
1 vote

Does the given solution is correct:

When S is symmetric and transitive, if S contain (3,1),(1,3) then (3,3) should also be present form transitivity.

 

Please verify the solution.

in Set Theory & Algebra
571 views

4 Comments

@GateOverflow04 Bro the Relation S is wrong because in the question they said S is symmetric and transitive but S  doesnt have (3,3) pair as

( 3 S 1 ),(1 S 3 ) so according to transtive property ( 3 S 3 ) should be present

2
2
would (1,1) not be in S ?
3
3

@ankitgupta.1729 hi

i saw some one calling you "sir” in one of the answers so im also sticking to this convention 😅

 

yes sir (1,1) should also be present in S 

because if we see the other way (1,3) (3,1) so from transitivity (1,1) should be present in S

 

3
3

1 Answer

4 votes
4 votes

The best way to solve this question is by taking counter example

EDIT : I forgot to write (a,a) in set S it's from transitive property (a,c),(c,a) so (a,a) should be present in S

edited by

1 comment

thanks you !!
0
0
Quick search syntax
tags tag:apple
author user:martin
title title:apple
content content:apple
exclude -tag:apple
force match +apple
views views:100
score score:10
answers answers:2
is accepted isaccepted:true
is closed isclosed:true