First of all find the keys.
This is what I do for it, find all attributes not appearing on RHS of FDs. These attributes must be prime attributes- must be in present in some candidate key. Now, find their minimal cover and add other attributes so that the minimal cover covers the entire attributes.
Here, A and B are not on RHS, so must be in candidate key. AB determines {A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J} and hence becomes the candidate key as well.
Now, A-> D, A->E B ->F are partial FDs. So, the relation is not in 2NF.
To make it in 2NF, we decompose in to 3 relations
A->DEIJ giving ADEIJ, B->F and F->GH giving BFGH and AB -> C giving ABC.
These 3 relations are in 2NF. and ABC is in BCNF. In ADEIJ, we have transitive dependencies
A-> D and D -> IJ
and in BFGH we have transitive dependency B -> F and F-> GH
So, to make the table into 3NF, we make a separate relation for DIJ and FGH. So, now we get 5 relations
ABC, ADE, DIJ, BF and FGH which is in 3NF. None of the prime-attribute comes on right hand side of any FD => so as soon as the relation is in 3NF, it is in BCNF as well. Or you can see for each non-trivial FD α → β, whether α is a candidate key. (non-trivial means β ⊄ α)