in Compiler Design edited by
7,938 views
15 votes
15 votes

Consider the syntax directed translation scheme $\textsf{(SDTS)}$ given in the following. Assume attribute evaluation with bottom-up parsing, i.e., attributes are evaluated immediately after a reduction.

  • $E\rightarrow  E_{1} * T \qquad \{E.val = E_{1}.val * T.val\}$
  • $E\rightarrow  T \qquad \qquad \{E.val = T.val\}$
  • $T\rightarrow  F - T_{1}\qquad \{T.val = F.val - T_{1}.val\}$
  • $T\rightarrow F \qquad \qquad \{T.val = F.val\}$
  • $F\rightarrow 2 \qquad \qquad \{F.val = 2\}$
  • $F\rightarrow 4 \qquad \qquad \{F.val = 4\}$
  1. Using this $\textsf{SDTS},$ construct a parse tree for the expression $4 - 2 - 4 * 2$  and also compute its $E.val$.
  2. It is required to compute the total number of reductions performed to parse a given input. Using synthesized attributes only, modify the $\textsf{SDTS}$ given, without changing the grammar, to find $E.red$, the number of reductions performed while reducing an input to $E$.
in Compiler Design edited by
7.9k views

3 Comments

$-$ is farthest from the start symbol, and $*$ is nearest to the start symbol, therefore, $-$ has higher precedence than $*$. $-$ is right associative as if an expression contains more than one $-$ then tree will grow towards right side, and $-$ present at the lower part of the tree towards right side will be evaluated before the $-$ present at the upper part of the tree towards left side, as Production T is right recursive.

So, expression will evaluate to 12.
0
0
Dont assume precedence of operator by yourself always take care of precedence and associativity given in question.
0
0
I wonder what would have been different in B section if, instead of using “Synthesized Attribute” we use inherited attribute?
0
0

3 Answers

30 votes
30 votes
Best answer

   Given expression $4-2-4*2$

Total reductions = 10

  1. Expression value, $E.val = 12$
  2. Total number of reductions performed, $E.red = 10$ (number of non-leaf nodes in the parse tree)
edited by

3 Comments

number of reductions is nothing but the number of non-leaves in the parse tree ...
19
19
Please explain part B of the question.
0
0

@Hira Thakur From the perspective of parsing the input its not necessary to  compute the total number of reductions. 

btw are u preparing for GATE?? 

0
0
33 votes
33 votes
SDTS to find the number of reductions::

E→ E1 * T {E.red = E1.red+ T.red+1}

E→T {E.red = T.red+1}

T→F - T1 {T.red = F.red + T1.red+1}

T→F {T.red = F.red+1}

F→2 {F.red = 1}

F→4 {F.red = 1}
by

1 comment

@VS ,you can edit the selected answer to include this as part b answer.
1
1
10 votes
10 votes

A. Given Expression is 4 - 2 - 4 * 2 , which can be rewritten as ((4 - (2 - 4))* 2) which is equal to 12.

2 Comments

how do we know that minus '-' is right to left?
0
0
second minus is at lower level than 1st minus so first 2-4=-2 then 4-(-2)=6 then 6*2 since is at higher level
1
1

Related questions